Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Knisfo/Archive
Knisfo
Knisfo (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
11 January 2015
[edit]- Suspected sockpuppets
- This is the third of the latest wave of edit-warring IP socks. One revert today.
- This is the second of the latest wave of edit-warring IP socks. Two reverts today.
- 46.114.54.219 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) This is the first edit-warring IP for today. One revert before switching to the one above.
- This is from last Christmas.
- 46.115.154.241 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) Also from Christmas 2014.
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
As soon as Knisfo stopped his edit-warring removing cited information on Northern Cyprus, in mid-December last year, dynamic SPA IPs started appearing providing edit-warring support for the master. It went quiet for a few weeks but now it suddenly erupted again just in time for the New Year. Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 10:50, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Evidence
- Master removing the word "only" first time with edit-summary: ("only" is not neutral) and then second time with edit-summary: (well, ok, forget about the UN - but "only" is NOT neutral).
- IP 46.115.15.229 with edit-summary starting with: ("only" is not neutral, i said !...) - just like master.
- IP 46.114.139.160 editing LGBT rights in the Faroe Islands mentioning "Faroe Islands" in edit-summary - master editing LGBT rights in Finland mentioning "Faroes" in edit-summary.
- All SPA IPs doing exactly the same and removing the 8 RS supporting the term "only". Please see their single or two-edit contributions.
Comments by other users
[edit]Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit] Clerk note: I agree that the IPs are the master account not logged in, not just based on the content affected but also on the very similar edit summaries (use of question marks, exclamation points, etc.). I've blocked the master for one month, although the master hasn't edited since December 29. As for the IPs, it's largely a waste of time to block them unless the disruption becomes more pervasive, e.g., other articles. I've therefore semi-protected Northern Cyprus for two weeks. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 08:24, 12 January 2015 (UTC)