Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Wenzeslaus of Liechtenstein
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Prince Philipp of Liechtenstein. There is consensus that there is not enough for a separate article. I took the couple of references on his liaison with Adriana Lima and added them to the article on his father. I didn't see anything else we could use. Haukur (talk) 22:11, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Prince Wenzeslaus of Liechtenstein (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Well, this is cringeworthy. "Something of a society column figure on account of his relationship with Victoria's Secret model Adriana Lima"? Am I wrong in perceiving this as his main claim to notability? The rest of the article is about whom his brothers have married and what his father does for a living. I have found an article centered on him but I am not sure whether that is enough to establish notability per WP:GNG, so I hereby seek your input. Surtsicna (talk) 20:05, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- Merge: What little substance there is here would probably do just fine expanding the article about his father, and if more information comes up to support the present notability of Prince Wenzelaus himself, or if he does something notable in the future, then he can certainly have his own article. Krinn DNZ (talk) 23:13, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. There are 3 refs described as "genealogy sources", all 3 being BLP-violating SPS (with one fully deprecated). I'm guessing any of the info showing up in actual RS news is either already on Lima's page or UNDUE. JoelleJay (talk) 01:27, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:32, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom --Devokewater @ 20:36, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:09, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete possibly with partial merge, stretching notability but agree with Krinn DNZ that some information might be merged into the father's article. Awbfiend (talk) 19:16, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete collatoral members of royal houses are not default notable, especially when they are the royal house of a micro-nation.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:07, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete possibly merge, but very few sources. Balle010 (talk) 18:22, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- Merge per krinndnz, WP:SIGCOV, and my standards for nobility. I looked online to verify some of the claims in the article. There have been few full stories in newspapers of record. There have been a few short stories about his dating a model, one in the article already, another that I added, and several stories that briefly list him as an "eligible bachelor". I could find no information about any charitable or business work that he's done. Again, there's broad coverage, but it's very shallow, which is to be blunt, how he sounds. As per my standards, I would leave open the possibility of a redirect to his father's article. Bearian (talk) 00:15, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.